Drawings Archive for the Project Team
| 1. Drawings_Archive_Code.jpg |
Mechanical Design Engineer: Afsaneh Cooper
Date created: March 3, 2020
Date Updated: 31/07/2022
Date created: March 3, 2020
Date Updated: 31/07/2022
The following green screen with about 6 rows is called: Accordion. Each row is called Pleat. On the right top corner of each pleat you can see + sign. Click on + pleat opens and you can see several Downloadable files or slide shows. First go to pleat 5 to see the contents of the drawings in this web page. When you found your related content, see on the left column the Drawing ID/Name of the drawing you are looking for. Then read the contents of the following 6 pleats. After you chose the topic [pleat] you need click on the right top + sign in the same pleat. Download the relevant drawing. If you need to discuss the drawing with Afsaneh Cooper, please send your SMS through WhatsApp. Then I would call you. You will receive my first SMS by a business card including my contact details. File 1.Drawing_Archive_Code.jpg is access code for this web page, please keep this confidential as it is only given to stakeholders of the project with the following Accordion drawings:
1. Drawings about Limestone Retaining wall - Zone 1L
| D1_D2_Drawings_of_licensed_surveyor.pdf |
| D2_r4.pdf |
| D3.pdf |
| D5_r5.pdf |
| D5_DR3_DR1_DR2_DR6_DR3_DR3.pdf |
| trial_orders_20-8-2021.jpg |
| Retaining_Wall_Rules_at_62_Calley_as4678-2002_design_criteria_for_retaining_walls.pdf |
| 4._assessment_rubric_ret.wall_needs_62_calley.pdf |
2. Drawings about Removing 1986 Natural limestone retaining wall and installing post and panel retaining wall
Zones 1l, 2l, 3l, 4l [11METERS long]
Zones 1l, 2l, 3l, 4l [11METERS long]
| D6_r3.pdf |
| 4. D23_r3.pdf |
| 3. D24_r2.pdf |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| 7. DR29.pdf |
| 9. D5_r5.pdf |
| 10. D6_r3.pdf |
| 11. DR12_r3.pdf |
| |||||||||||||
| |||
| |||
| |||
|
| |||||
| 20. D27_quote.pdf |
| 21. D28_Zones_1L_2L_3L.pdf |
| 22. D29.pdf |
| D6_DR35.pdf |
| 17. D1_D2_Drawings_of_Licensed_Surveyor.pdf |
| D29_DR33.pdf_extract.pdf |
| D34.pdf |
| DR9_r4.pdf |
| DR10_r2.pdf |
| DR32_r1.pdf |
| DR33_r1.pdf |
| D35_jp.pdf |
| drawings_a.cooper_fr-gen-645-2020_trial_27-7-2022.pdf |
3. Drawings about Cost Management: TWO OWNERS' BOUNDARY FEATURES AND LEVEL HEIGHTS AND PERCENTAGE OF CHANGE IN nATURAL GROUND LEVEL - Slide show of Zones along the boundary
Location of Zones 1L to 10L referred in many Affidavits, many emails and at the phone for simplification of Boundary #62 & #64 complexities in communication between stakeholders:
| D18.pdf |
SECTION A-A OF ZONE 1L - SCREEN WALL #62:
| D11.jpg |
| D5_dr2.pdf |
| D8.pdf |
RIGHT VIEWS OF LS1 - RETAINING WALL 2008 #64:
| D14.jpg |
| D9_r6.pdf |
RIGHT VIEW OF LS2 - RETAINING WALL 2008 #64:
| 6._d10_r4.pdf |
| DR13_zone_8L.jpg |
Left View of the retaining walls and surfaces in boundary #64 & #62 using many points from Licensed surveyor's two drawings, to see which owner has changed the natural ground level and whether that owner has a retaining wall next to the boundary or not?:
| D3_r4.pdf |
Left View of the Contour of the proposed Dividing Fence Line for hilly boundary 64 & 62, Using many points from licensed surveyor's two drawings:
| D4_r2.pdf |
| D12.pdf |
Slide show of Zone 1L
Slides of Zones 2L, 3L: The Rock Limestone retaining wall of 1986 at #64. On trial date 20/8/2021 magistrate ordered the structural engineer report be used for judgement of the following disputes:
a. Whether the retaining wall is needed?
b. If retaining wall is needed, why type?
The structural engineer first report states the owner #62 has piled 400mm sand behind the white brick screen wall [Zone 7L] which is joint to their house. Therefore the term Screen brick wall is used in report of structural engineer [it is not a boundary wall nor it is a dividing fence line].
a. Whether the retaining wall is needed?
b. If retaining wall is needed, why type?
The structural engineer first report states the owner #62 has piled 400mm sand behind the white brick screen wall [Zone 7L] which is joint to their house. Therefore the term Screen brick wall is used in report of structural engineer [it is not a boundary wall nor it is a dividing fence line].
Zone 4L Slides and LS1 Retaining wall, LS2 Retaining wall, at #64. These two zones on 1/8/2005 did not have retaining wall but sand on #64 was high enough to expect a retaining wall from past there. Extra sand at #64 were removed in 2008 to make the bent dividing fence stable.
Slide show of Zone 8L: In this Zone which is located between the front of 60 cm high brick retaining wall #62 [holding their rear terrace sand, and front of garden brick wall of #62. You face to front door of #64 for your sides names [front, left, right, back]
4. Orders requested based on engineer's report about #62 barriers to dividing fence installation for #64
| b2.pdf_extract.pdf |
This file b2.pdf_extract.pdf is extracted from attachment B2 of the form 32a of the defendant. You can also find B2 in litigation files web-page. The extracted file only includes pages 4-15 of the attachment B2. The content is written by Engineer Afsaneh Cooper a Mechanical engineer. This file lists the orders which are required for boundary of #62 & #64, so the dividing fence be installed correctly. Since the two storms 29/8/2019 and 6/5/2020 have removed all the dividing fence in Zones 2L, 3L, 4L, 8L, 9L and 10L, it is important that same problems of the past does not add to the future cost of the dividing fence.
| D10_r4.pdf |
| D26_r3.pdf |
| s1045375_-_report_certified_certified.pdf |
File s1045375...is from Engineer Ahmad who is a structural engineer at Structerre. He attended boundary #62 & #64 and based on order of magistrate and defendant's lawyer prepared an engineer's report. What is important in his report:
a. Zone 1L at #62 is piled by sand. The recorded 400mm for height of piled sand is not relevant to the orders made my the magistrate on trial 20/8/2021, therefore engineer Cooper of #64 drew all files in this web page specially DR2 in file D5. See pleat 1 in this accordion and open file D5.PDF. Then see Drawing DR2 in that file. This way you can see a more accurate figure for sand height at #62 Zone 1L, Maximum pile of sand above natural ground level which is coincident with sand height next to boundary at #64 in Zone 1L in same section A-A. Engineer Ahmad stated in his report that each party who is going to do the work for a retaining wall can approach Structerre for further advise and his report is not for drawing it is for determining whether the retaining wall is needed, if yes, what type, only. The claimant's conception of the structural engineer's report is misconception because they want quickly build the same type Aluminum plinth, which prevents the sand of being washed into neighbor's land. The rules of the Minister for commerce is retaining wall design needs to be based on Australian standard codes and it should be designed by a structural engineer. Fence quote for aluminum plinth of colorbond is not enough. Therefore the draft 1 of mechanical engineer's drawings as the following sets were drawn by Engineer A. Cooper, M.F.Gordon [2 drawings]licensed surveyor], also Structerre [1 drawing]:
a. Zone 1L at #62 is piled by sand. The recorded 400mm for height of piled sand is not relevant to the orders made my the magistrate on trial 20/8/2021, therefore engineer Cooper of #64 drew all files in this web page specially DR2 in file D5. See pleat 1 in this accordion and open file D5.PDF. Then see Drawing DR2 in that file. This way you can see a more accurate figure for sand height at #62 Zone 1L, Maximum pile of sand above natural ground level which is coincident with sand height next to boundary at #64 in Zone 1L in same section A-A. Engineer Ahmad stated in his report that each party who is going to do the work for a retaining wall can approach Structerre for further advise and his report is not for drawing it is for determining whether the retaining wall is needed, if yes, what type, only. The claimant's conception of the structural engineer's report is misconception because they want quickly build the same type Aluminum plinth, which prevents the sand of being washed into neighbor's land. The rules of the Minister for commerce is retaining wall design needs to be based on Australian standard codes and it should be designed by a structural engineer. Fence quote for aluminum plinth of colorbond is not enough. Therefore the draft 1 of mechanical engineer's drawings as the following sets were drawn by Engineer A. Cooper, M.F.Gordon [2 drawings]licensed surveyor], also Structerre [1 drawing]:
5. Contents of the Drawing Files in this Accordion: d1 - d36
D1 |
Surveyor's certificate |
D2 |
Feature and level survey, South West Boundary of 64 Calley Drive, Leeming |
D3 |
Change in Natural ground level Drawing |
D4 |
Contour of the dividing fence line |
D5 |
Zone 1L, Limestone retaining wall |
D6 |
Zones: 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L post & Panel retaining wall and ground level heights (2005-2021) in boundary #64 & #62. |
D7 |
Precast concrete retaining wall - Wall Section by Structerre/Wonderwall |
D8 |
DR2 Drawing sketched in D5 Drawing. Section A-A before retaining wall was built. Location: Zone 1L [10/8/2020] |
D9 |
DR12 Drawing: Limestone Retaining wall - KLB - 2008 in Zone 4L. |
D10 |
DR13: Change in Natural ground level in Zone 8L - LS2 Retaining wall at #64 and Brick wall 440mm high at #62. |
D11 |
Extract of Zone 1L domain from drawing D2 of M.F.Gordon licensed surveyor. |
D12 |
Attachment to D4 Drawing. Data analysis - Contour of dividing fence line on the hill of #64 & #64 |
D13 |
Project management chart_2005-2009-r2 |
D14 |
Drawing Details_BA-2007-1687_17-8-2007 |
D15 |
Boundaries details_BA-2007-1687_17-8-2007 |
D16 |
Framed views of building license 2007 KLB limestone retaining wall. |
D17 |
Email of James Woodford to court about 13 reasons claimant’s form 23 should be dismissed |
D18 |
Boundary Zones #62 |
D19 |
Zone 5G: Undermining of Fence into #64 in 2014 by an encroaching Post of a crossing Retaining wall [at #62] - Undermining Fence by lowering ground level - Refusing to pay for Retaining cost by Fraud |
D20 |
- Zones 2G - 3G Retaining wall made of limestone Rocks built about 1986 at #64 Calley Dr. - Zone 4G - Reticulated garden at #64 Calley, back yard. - Present "South View" of Zones 2G, 3G, 4G from #64 Calley. |
D21 |
Drawings for number of limestone blocks used in KLB Retaining wall [built in 2008 with license BL2-BL3] is in process to calculate exact number of blocks used in this wall in 3 neighbors' boundary by defendant [#64]. |
D22 |
Licensed Surveyor 2008 and KLB Costs Percentage. from a CD dated 2011. In Process. |
D23 |
Left views of: a. boundary #62 & #64, b. Proposed LS ret.walls in Zones 1L, 4L C. Proposed Post & Panel ret.wall in Zones 2L, 3L d. Top view of post for Advanced Modular retaining post & panel ret.wall |
D24 |
Post and Panel Retaining manufactured by Advanced Modular Retaining and Certified by Structural Engineer John Tick |
D25 |
-Drawing Details of 4 Limestone retaining walls built at #64: LS1, LS2, LS3, LS4 in 1986 and in 2008 in the cost of owner of #64. -Also drawings of side yard #62 Contour, top views. - Sections D-D of LS1 ret.wall & LS3 ret.wall -Section F-F of LS2 ret.wall & LS4 ret.wall -drawing of Side yard of #64 and #62 contours, top views, Zones: 2L, 3L, 4L, 8L |
D26 |
& 284 - 700mm) change in Natural ground level in Zones: 4L & 8L Boundary #64 and #62 Calley. #62 owner did not disclose this in 2008. |
DR1 |
Top view of the Zone 1L and 7L before LS6 ret.wall is built. Date: 9/12/2021. Time taken to draw: 5hours. Hourly rate: $60. Drafter: Engr. Afsaneh Cooper |
DR2 |
Section A-A before LS6-retaining wall is built. Zone 1L. Date: 9/12/2021. Time taken to draw: 5 hours. Hourly rate: $60. Drafter: Engr. Afsaneh Cooper. Attachments: DR1, DR2, DR3, DR4, DR5, DR6, DR23. |
DR3 |
Section A-A Back View, Zone 1L, Limestone-LS6-retaining wall Date: 28/12/2021 & 30/05/2022 & 8/06/2022 Time taken to draw: 5 hours Hourly rate: $60 Drafter: Afsaneh Cooper. Attachments: DR1, DR2, DR3, DR4, DR5, DR6, DR23. |
DR4 |
Left View of the Proposed LS6-Limestone retaining wall Date: 28/12/2021 & 8/06/2022 Time taken to draw and find supplier/Installer/Structural Engineer data & Quotes for drafting data: 5 hours Hourly rate: $60 Drafter: Afsaneh Cooper. |
DR5 |
Top View of the Proposed LS6-Limestone retaining wall Date: 28/12/2021 & 8/06/2022 Time taken to draw and find Licensed Surveyor/Structural engineer data & Quotes & payment and research for accuracy and amendment and court listing of drawing for drafting data: 5 hours Hourly rate: $60 Drafter: Afsaneh Cooper. |
DR6 |
Date: 28/12/202 & 8/06/2022 Time taken to draw and find Licensed Surveyor/Lawyer/Structural Engineer data & Quotes & payment and research for accuracy and amendment and court listing of drawing for drafting data: 5 hours Hourly rate: $60 Drafter: Afsaneh Cooper. |
DR7 |
Advanced Modular Retaining Wall-up to 1500mm / Post & Panel Retaining wall - Post Section & Table for Fence Over - Boundary Lot 389 (#62) & Lot 390 (#64) Attachments: D6_r3 Date: 8/6/2022 Drawn by: Structural Engineer from: {Advanced Modular Retaining (Factory-Direct Supplier)} |
DR8 |
Left view {(South West) - from front yard of #64} of the "Precast Concrete Post and Panel Retaining wall" in Zones 1L, 2L, 3L for boundary #62 & #64 Attachments: D6, DR7, DR9, DR10, DR32, D23 |
DR9 |
Section (R-S) - Front View [View towards East] of the LS5 - Rock Limestone Retaining Wall 1986 (at #64) Date:18/01/2022 Time: 6 hours for photography, webcasting, licensed surveying data transfer, drawing and filing in civil court Hourly rate: $60 Drafter: Engr. Afsaneh Cooper |
DR10 |
Natural ground level drawing for boundary lots 389 & 390 or #62 & #64. Zones 1L to Zone 10L. Date: 18/1/2022 Time: 6 hours for transferring data from D3 and D1, D2 drawing to this simple drawing. Consulting and meeting with lawyer. copying, scanning, and printing for Civil court case: Form 23, Form 2-B-Affidavit-Retaining wall and drawing. Hourly rate: $60/hour Drafter: Engr. Afsaneh Cooper |
DR11 |
Section of post for the proposed Wonderwall post and panel retaining wall, drawn and signed by Structerre Structural Engineer Ahmad Nazri [Associate Diploma] to determine just the type of retaining wall needed in Zones 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L by court order date 20/08/2021. This Firm did not want to be involved in #64 Owner application for planning and Building date: 21/1/2022. So this application was prepared by Structural Engineer John Tick on 8/6/2022 instead. Previous versions of Drawings D5, D6 drawn by Engineer Afsaneh Cooper had to be revised on 8/6/2022. Therefore, in viewing a drawing, you must check with this engineer A.Cooper to make sure you are looking at the updated drawing which should be 8/6/2022 or after this date. Engineer J. Tick ignored drawing DR11 because that drawing was prepared in general and was not prepared for application for planning and building. |
DR12 |
Change in Natural Ground level, in Zone 4L, Since 9/07/2005 Date: 24/01/2022 Time:20 hours Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: |
DR13 |
Change in Natural Ground Level, in Zone 8L, Since 9/07/2005 Date: 24/01/2022 Time:20 hours Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: DR12, DR14, DR29, DR30, DR31, DR35, DR36, D23, D25, D26_r2 |
DR14 |
Top view of LS1-Retaining wall [2008] and LS3-Retaining wall [1986] Date: 2/03/2022 Time: 14 hours Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: DR12, DR13, DR29, DR30, DR31, DR35, DR36, D23, D25, D26_r2 |
DR15 |
Value |
DR16 |
Value |
DR17 |
|
R18 |
|
R19 |
|
DR20 |
|
DR21 |
Value |
DR22 |
Top View of LS1 & LS3 retaining walls Date: 23/06/2022 Time:30 hours Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: D25, DR12, DR13, DR14, DR23, DR24, DR25, DR26, DR27, DR28, DR29, DR30 |
DR23 |
Top View of Zones 1L, 2L, 3L without the LS5-Rock Limestone ret.wall, at side yard of #64 Date: 23/06/2022 Time:1 hour Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: D24, D25, D5, D6, D26, DR4, DR5, DR32, DR33 |
DR24 |
Top View of Zone 2L, at #62 side yard Date: 23/06/2022 Time:1 hour [including manual measurement using 4.2m long fence capping] Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: D6, D23, D24, D25, DR32, DR33, |
DR25 |
Top View of Zone 3L, at #62 Side yard Date: 23/06/2022 Time:1 hour [including manual measurement using 4.2m long fence capping] Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: D6, D23, D24, D25, D26, DR32, DR33, |
DR26 |
Top View of Zone 4L, at #62 Side yard Date: 23/06/2022 Time: 1 hour [including manual measurement using 4.2m long fence capping] Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: D6, D23, D24, D25, D26, DR12, DR13, DR32, DR33, |
DR27 |
Top View of Zone 8L, at #62 Side yard Date: Time: 23/06/2022 Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: D23, D25, D26, DR12, DR13, DR35, DR36 |
DR28 |
Top View of Zone 8L, at #64 Side yard Date: 23/06/2022 Time: 1 Hour Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: DR13, DR27, DR30, D25, D26, |
DR29 |
Section D-D in LS1 and LS3 ret.walls in Zone 4L [for details] Date: 23/06/2022 Time:30 Hours Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: DR30, Shortage of 700mm sand in compared to Natural ground level in Zone 4L in 1987 was compromised by building an inadequate 440mm high brick wall in Zone 4L which was demolished by second owner [Desai] of #62 for a bid to get a free Twinside ret.wall and a free Limestone remedial retaining wall in Zones 9L, 10L in fortnight after 9/7/2005 abusing owner of #64 mentally by threat of $88,000 legal cost in ongoing defense against 4 rational claims of cost for dividing fence cost and retaining walls cost paid by owner #64, the owners of #62 had to settled by their RAC Building insurer lawyer agreeing with IAL/SGIO Lawyer of owner #64 on 3/09/2008 Deed of Release. All 4 cases against owners of #62 which 2 had been closed before date of this Deed and 2 were closed on the Deed Date, were closed and terms and conditions were set for future claims of all 6 parties in relation to future claims and pleading, one being prejudice, second being "not disclosing correct information", 3rd being claiming about matters arisen from the matters closed on Deed time of 3/9/2008, etc. Owners of #62 breached the above terms and conditions on 25/06/2020 in their Form 53 case FR/GEN/645/2020 and in same case in their Form 32A, March 2021, Form 23 of 16/12/2021 and Form 24 of March 2022. As a result all their Forms except Form 53 and Form 32A were dismissed and their proposed Aluminium retaining wall of their Form 53 also was rejected in Oct 6, 2021 by Structerre Ahmad Nazri associate engineer and Shane Just structural engineer and on 8/6/2022 by Aprodem Structural Engineer. The remaining of their Form 53 for Colorbond fence being rejected by owner of #64 is going to be judged by magistrate on hearing 27/07/2022. No retaining walls orders are going to be issued in case FR/GEN/645/2020 as the costs for the retaining wall + Dividing Fence must be under $10,000 which is not. ______________________ |
DR30 |
Value |
DR31 |
Value |
DR32 |
|
Template for Bill of Materials |
Date: Time: Hourly rate:$60 Drafter: Engineer Afsaneh Cooper Attachments: |
D27 |
Ekodeck Dividing Fence Catalogue and Quotes |
Value |
|
6. Drawings of Ekodeck Dividing Fence
| D27.pdf |
In File D27 Please refer to pages: 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 27, 28, 29 for other drawings, photos, and worksheets which relates to various components of the Ekodeck Dividing Fence.
Ekodeck panel with gaps and Privacy at #62:
| D36.pdf |
Northern boundary Fence: #66 & #64 Dividing Fence during 2013-2022:
| D37.pdf |
Zone 6L Dividing Fence measurement Plan & gaps with the screen single brick wall at #62 [unauthorized retaining wall]
| D38.pdf |
7. Magistrate court case FR/GEN/645/2020_fILES_After trial 27/7/2022
Drawings and reports of two Structural Engineering Companies and a Licensed Surveyor about needed boundary work in #62 Calley:
From the following Files please first open files: 1 to 5 which are related to Developmental Approval at Shire.
From the following Files please first open files: 1 to 5 which are related to Developmental Approval at Shire.
| 1. D27_Assessment Rubric for Magistrate_Surfaces Heights |
| 2. D6_DR36_Site Plan_SP1_rev_A_showing_location_of_new_panel_and_post_retainng_wall_Cert_1Aug22_Aprodem_J_Tick__1_.pdf |
| 3. D37_Elevations & Sections dwg E1_rev_a_wall_and_Fence_Cert_1_Aug_22_Aprodem_j_tick.pdf |
| 4. Structerre_Report_D1_D3_D4.pdf |
| 5. Drawings_A.Cooper_FR-GEN-645-2020_Trial_27-7-2022.pdf |
| 6. WPC_Fencing_was_Permitted_by_Shire.pdf |
| 7. Ekodeck Dividing Fence #62 & #64 approval by shire |
| 8. Sufficiency of Ekodeck Fence #62 & #64 .pdf |
| 9. SGIO_MidCity_Cause to the damage of the dividing Fence #62 & #64 Calley Dr, Leeming.pdf |
| 10. D1_JP_Certified_boundary_location_licensed_surveyor.pdf |
| 11. D2_JP_Certified_Feature_and_level_Survey_r4.pdf |
| 12. D35_jp.pdf |
| 13. D24_r2.pdf |
| 14. D23_r3.pdf |
| 15. D25_r2.pdf |
| 16. D26_r3.pdf |
| 17. Z6_Screen_Brick_Wall_#62.pdf |
| 18. D5_r5.pdf |
| 19. D4_r2_D12.pdf |
| 20. D3.pdf |
| 21. D9_r6.pdf |
title 8
title 9
title 10
title 18
title 23
title 30
title 44