Dividing Fence Act and Project Management Techniques

PMT (Project Management Techniques) for Hill Retaining Walls by extension of Dividing Fence ACT
Date started: 6/1/2020 Date updated: 01/10/2021

In the following accordion please click on + on the right corner to open each PLEAT. iN EACH PLEASE EITHER THERE IS AN ELEMENT OF FILE OR THERE IS AN ELEMENT OF IMAGE, ETC. tO CLOSE THE pleat please click on - on the right corner. First find the title, which you like to know more about it, among several pleate titles. Each pleat includes a title and some elements.

1. User guide of this PMT web page
NOTE: IN THIS WEBSITE YOU CLICK ON BLUE CONTENTS, THEN YOU SEE THE LINKS.

I SUGGEST YOU START FROM THE BOTTOM OF THIS WEB PAGE. THIS WEB PAGE IS PRIVATE, PLEASE DO NOT SHARE IT WITH PUBLIC FOR LEGAL COMMITMENTS. I ALSO SUGGEST YOU READ ZONE 1, ZONE 1B, ZONE 1L, ZONE 1G, ZONE 1 E WITH SAME ORDER I WROTE HERE TOGETHER AS A SET. THESE ZONES NOW IS REFERRED IN PHOTOS STICKY NOTES [COMMENTS]. THE DEFINITION OF A ZONE IS A LINE [i.e., A-B] ON A BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN 64 & 62 C. "C" STANDS FOR FIRST LETTER OF THE STREET ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY. ZONES ARE INDEXED IN STICKY NOTE FOR PHOTOS. ALSO ZONES ARE INDEXED IN MANUAL DRAWINGS, AND LICENSED SURVEYOR'S DRAWING [20534_1_HEIGHTS_..]. ON MANUAL DRAWINGS LENGTH OF ZONES ARE NOT ACCURATE BUT ZONE NUMBERS ARE ACCURATE [ZONE 5 REFERS A LINE INCLUDING ZONES 8+9+10 FOR ABBREVIATION PURPOSE IN SOME EARLIER DATED PHOTOS]. ON LICENSED SURVEYOR'S DRAWING TITLED: FEATURE AND LEVEL SURVEY, SOUTH WEST BOUNDARY OF 64 CALLEY [...] , [...], ZONES ARE MARKED FROM LEFT TO RIGHT AS FOLLOWS:
ZONE 6L, ZONE 7L, ZONE 1L, ZONE 2L, ZONE 3L, ZONE 4L, ZONE 8L, ZONE 9L, ZONE 10L IN AREA BELONGING TO LOT [....3] MARKED ON DRAWING NO: 20534_1_HEIGHTS_R3.

HOWEVER, THE DRAWING WITH APPENDIX: R3 IN ITS "DRAWING NO.", IS OUTDATED. SHIRE RECEIVED THE OUTDATED ONE, ALSO THE BUILDING INSURER OF 64 C. ALSO ASK ME FOR THE UPDATED DRAWING IN FUTURE TIME WHEN I HAVE COPIED ONE FROM PSTED ONE. PLEASE DO NOT USE THOSE OUTDATED DRAWINGS IN LEGAL MATTER BUT YOU CAN USE THEM IN EMAILS FOR REFERENCES.

TO OPEN THE PDF FILES IN THIS WEB PAGE, MAKE SURE YOU DOUBLE CLICK ON YELLOW OR BLUE SMALL SQUARE [MY STICKY NOTE (COMMENT) FOR EACH PHOTO IN THE PDF FILE]. LETTER INDEXES IN ZONES REFER TO INCIDENCES DATES. THEREFORE IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT A PHOTO DATED 15/1/2020, THE PHOTO COMMENT INCLUDES ZONE 1, BUT IN SAME PDF FILE YOU MIGHT SEE A PHOTO WITH STICKY NOTE WHICH INCLUDES ZONE 1G AND ITS DATE IS LATER THAN 15/1/2020. IT HAS BEEN TRIED TO ARRANGE THE PHOTOS IN EACH FILE CHRONOLOGICAL. HOWEVER, WHEN YOU CORRESPOND IN REGARDS TO THESE PHOTOS, YOU MUST REFER TO PDF FILE NAME, PAGE NUMBER IN SAME PDF FILE YOU ARE REFERRING,
PLEASE SEE ZONES 1-5 PDF FILES AND CLICK ON EACH PHOTO YOU SEE, WHERE THERE IS A YELLOW SQUARE ON THE PHOTO. THAT YELLOW/BLUE SQUARE OPENS AND PLEASE DRAG THE RIGHT SIDE KNOB ON THAT BOX TO READ MORE. ALSO PLEASE PASS THIS PDF FILE YOU JUST READ ABOUT MY COMMENTS TO OTHER STAKEHOLDERS TO REPLY ON THE SAME YELLOW COMMENT BOX AND SEND THEIR COMMENTS TO ME. THANKS FOR COOPERATION AND ECONOMICAL PROCESS OF OUR DIVIDING FENCE ISSUES AND COMMENTS OF THE STAKEHOLDERS.
IF YOU COULD NOT OPEN THE COMMENTS IN PAGES OF THE FOLLOWING PDF FILES, PLEASE TYPE: BT14 IN SEARCH BOX OF THIS WEBSITE TO SEE A WEB PAGE ABOUT PROJECT MANAGEMENT FREE TOOLS. THERE YOU CAN CLICK ON LINKS: 64-71 TO SEE THE ONLINE FREE SOFTWARE'S, WHICH OPEN PDF FILES AND YOU CAN READ THOSE COMMENTS. ALSO TRY SODAPDF.COM FOR COMMENT BOXES, WHICH ARE BLUE IN THE FOLLOWING PDF FILES. CLICK ON THE COMMENT BOX AND READ THE COMMENTS OR REPLY TO IT. SOME PDF FILES WERE PRODUCED BY COMBINING THE MOST RELEVANT PHOTOS TO SURVEYING. LICENSED SURVEYOR PRODUCED TWO SETS OF DRAWINGS FOR BOUNDARY 62 & 64 CALLEY ON 10/6/2020. IN JULY 28/7/2020 HIS SURVEY DRAWING WAS ALMOST COMPLETED. HE MARKED TEN ZONES ON THE BOUNDARY IN HIS DRAWING. ZONES 1L TO 10L. "L" STANDS FOR LICENSED SURVEYED ZONE MEASUREMENTS. THESE PDF FILES ARE:
   ZONE 1L ZONE 6L ZONE 5L=ZONE 8L+ZONE 9L+ZONE 10L
   ZONE 2L ZONE 7L
   ZONE 3L ZONE 8L
   ZONE 4L ZONE 9L
   ZONE 5L ZONE 10L
OTHER DRAWINGS WITHOUT INDEX "L" THEIR MEASUREMENTS ARE NOT ACCURATE.

2. Optimum Fence Type: Wood Plastic Composite Fencing [WPC]

THIS TYPE OF FENCE IS OPTIMUM FOR BOUNDARY BETWEEN 62 C. & 64 C. BECAUSE 64 C. HAS MANY GARDENS NEXT TO BOUNDARY, BUT 62 C. HAS NO GARDEN OR IS SET FOR LOW MAINTENANCE OF RENTAL ONLY. WPC DOES NOT RUST, NOR IT ROTS. IT IS NOT EXPENSIVE TO BUY AND HAS FEW SCREWS TO INSTALL. INSTALLATION COST BY CONTRACTORS ARE MUCH CHEAPER THAN COLORBOND AND ALUMINIUM SLAT FENCE. THE SLATS IN WPC ARE DROPPED INTO TWO RAILS OF THE TWO POSTS. A BAY CREATED OF 180 CM - 240 CM LONG, AND 180 CM HIGH ABOVE THE GROUND. TWO POSTS OF THIS BAY ARE NOT PUSHED INTO CONCRETE MUD INSIDE TWO HOLES IN THE GROUND. INSTEAD THERE ARE TWO SHORT POSTS [50 CM HIGH] BY NAME OF POST PLATE, WHICH ARE PUSHED INTO CONCRETE MUD, WHICH ARE PUSHED IN TWO HOLES IN THE GROUND. THEN THE TWO HOLLOW ALUMINIUM POSTS [180 CM HIGH] (SOME TIMES NAMED SLEEVE POST) ARE PUSHED ON TOP OF THESE TWO SHORT POSTS (STIRRUP OR POST PLATE OR POST ANCHOR). THEREFORE THE "TWO POSTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE BAY" TOGETHER (POST SLEEVE AND POST PLATE) MAKE A 180 CM HIGH POST. THE PROPOSED FENCE TYPE 1 IS WOOD PLASTIC COMPOSITE WITH 180 CM HEIGHT ABOVE THE GROUND INCLUDING MID-TRELLIS. MID-TRELLIS WOULD PREVENT THE WPC DIVIDING FENCE COLLAPSE IN STORM [63-117 KM/HOUR-2019-2020]. BRUSHWOOD FENCE AND COLORBOND FENCE HAD BEEN REJECTED BY LAWYER OF RAC [SUPPORTING THREE NEIGHBOURS AT 62 C., 66 C. AND 13 L.). BEFORE SECOND EXCAVATION DATE IN 64 C. IN 2005 OWNER OF 64 C. WENT TO HOUSE OF OWNERS OF 62 C. TO SEEK THEIR AGREEMENT FOR THAT EXCAVATION. OWNER OF 66 C. TOLD HER AND GAVE HER WRITTEN CONSENT FOR REPLACING THE OLD DIVIDING FENCE AT REAR YARD WITH COLORBOND IN CASE THAT REAR YARD DIVIDING FENCE GETS DAMAGED NEEDING REPLACEMENT BASED ON 19 YEARS AGE OF THE DIVIDING FENCE AT 3 BOUNDARIES. THE WRITTEN DATED AND SIGNED CONSENT OF OWNER OF 66 C. WAS FILED IN HER COURT CASE BY OWNER OF 64 C. AS CLAIMANT LATER ON. OWNER OF 64 CALLEY ALSO REPEATED SAME PROCEDURE TO CONTACT OWNER OF 62 C. ON SAME DATE. OWNER OF 62 C. STATED THAT HE AD PURCHASED THAT PROPERTY FOR RENTAL ONLY TO MAKE MONEY, HE WAS NOT LIVING THERE BUT IT WAS RENTED TO SOME TENANTS BY A REAL ESTATE. THEREFORE HE REFUSED TO SPEND EVEN $1 ON MAINTENANCE OF HIS DIVIDING FENCE LINE, EITHER BY UPGRADING A 19 YEARS OLD DIVIDING FENCE (RISK BEING SUPERSIX FENCE BE DAMAGED BY BOBCAT, OR REMOVAL OF THE SUPERSIX DAMAGED FENCE BY ITS FOOTING DUE TO TREE ROOTS, REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OF THE OLD 19 YEARS OLD SUPERSIX FENCE SHEETS WITH NEW FENCE SHEETS). SO IT WAS APPARENT THAT OWNER OF 62 C. WAS STINGY, CONSIDERING BOTH HUSBAND AND WIFE OWNERS OF 62 C. WERE WORKING AND THEY HAD TWO PROPERTIES ONE FOR LIVING SECOND FOR RENTING IN 2005. ALSO NO FUTURE INVESTMENT PLAN THEY HAD FOR THIS 62 & 64 C. DIVIDING FENCE, NOT EVEN DESIRE TO LET OWNER OF 64 C. REMOVE THEIR REAR YARD SAND FOR ECONOMICAL COST OF RETAINING WALL BY REMOVING THEIR TWO HEAVY TREES NEXT TO BOUNDARY, NOR BY SAND REMOVAL OF THE COMMON HILL AT REAR YARD [ZONE 10L). OWNER OF 64 C. WENT AT SAME TIME AND KNOCKED ON FRONT DOOR OF 13 L. NEIGHBOUR WHO HAD A PROPERTY WITH LONG SHARED BOUNDARY WITH 66 C. AND 64 C. PROPERTIES TWICE. HE WAS NOT HOME AND DID NOT OPEN HIS FRONT DOOR. SO SHE LEFT THAT NEIGHBOUR BY LEAVING A NOTE IN HIS/HER LETTER BOX. THAT 13 L. OWNER IN COURT RESPONDED AS DEFENDANT TO OWNER OF 64 C. THAT HE HAD HAD A SUPERSIX FENCE FOR OVER 50 YEARS WHICH SERVED WELL AND THE 19 YEARS OLD FENCE AT 13 METERS LONG BOUNDARY 13L. AND 64 C. WAS NOT OLD WITH 19 YEARS OLD AGE TO PAY FOR ITS REPLACEMENT AT THAT AGE. THE ARBITRATOR WORKING FOR MAGISTRATE FAMILY COURT IN 2003 HAD ASSESSED THE WORTH OF ALL THREE DIVIDING FENCES BETWEEN 62 C. & 64 C. & 66 C. & 13 L. PROPERTIES (EXCLUDING NEIGHBOURS' HALF SHARE) WAS $2400. THEREFORE SINCE 62 C. FENCE LENGTH=34 METERS LONG, 66 C. FENCE LENGTH=37 METERS LONG, AND 13 L. FENCE LENGTH=13 METERS LONG, THEREFORE THE TOTAL OF THREE "BOUNDARIES LENGTH" IS 84 METERS LONG (=34+37+13). WE THEN CALCULATE (=$2400:84) VALUE AND CONCLUDE THAT THE VALUE OF DIVIDING FENCE IN 2003 PER METER LENGTH WAS $29/METER LENGTH. SINCE THE EXCAVATION HAPPENED IN 2005, THE LESS "TWO YEARS DEPRECIATION" CAN BE ESTIMATED TO: $26/METER LENGTH [=(17 X 29):19) BEING THE VALUE OF THE FENCE AT THREE BOUNDARIES OF 64 C. IN 2005. NOW IN 2020 THE LENGTH OF THE ZONE 9L=1.75 METERS, ZONE 10L=4.96 METERS, 1/3 OF ZONE 8L=(3.83):3=1.28 M. THEREFORE THE EXCAVATION LENGTH ALONG BOUNDARY 64C. & 62C. IS: 1.75+4.96+1.28=8 M. IN 2005 THE VALUE OF 19 YEARS OLD SUPERSIX FENCE BASED ON ARBITRATOR'S ASSESSMENT WAS 8 X 26 = $208. IN 2005 EXCAVATION LENGTH ALONG BOUNDARY 64C AND 13L. WAS 13 M LONG. THEREFORE THE VALUE OF 19 YEARS OLD SUPERSIX FENCE BASED ON ARBITRATOR'S ASSESSMENT WAS 13M X $26/M = $338. THE EXCAVATION LENGTH ALONG BOUNDARY 64C. & 66C. WAS: 5.7 M READ OVER THE BUILDING LICENSE DRAWING FOR THAT BOUNDARY RENOVATION. THEREFORE THE VALUE OF 19 YEARS OLD SUPERSIX FENCE BASED ON THE ARBITRATOR'S ASSESSMENT WAS 5.7M X $26/M = $148. THE MAXIMUM BOUNDARY LENGTH FOR THE DIVIDING FENCE LINE WHICH WAS AFFECTED BY EXCAVATION DISPUTES WAS: 8M + 13M + 5.7M = 26.7 M LONG. 26.7 X $26 = $694 ~ $700.
THE BUILDING INSURER OF THREE NEIGHBOURS 62C., 66C. AND 13L HAD THREATENED THE OWNER OF 64C. FOR $88000 LEGAL COST TO RESOLVE FENCING DISPUTES IN COURT USING VICTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE BY TREE LOPPING OVER BRADFORD RET.WALL [BY OWNER 13L) AND BY ARRANGING A PARTY [BY AGENT OF THE OWNER OF 62C.] AT EXCAVATION PHASE, BEFORE THE BRADFORD RET.WALL BE INSTALLED IN 62C. ALSO THE OWNER OF 66C. CLAIMED THAT HER FENCE WAS BROKEN BY BOBCAT AT 64C. THE BUILDING INSURER OF 64 C. TRUSTED THE VICTIMIZATIONS OF 62C., 66C. AND DID NOT INDEMNIFY THE OWNER 64C. FOR COSTS. ALSO THE COMPLIANCE ENGINEER RELIED ON MAJORITY STAKEHOLDERS AND TRIED TO HIDE THE PHOTO DATE AND FEATURE BY HOLDING A CORNER OF THE PHOTO, WHICH WAS QUICKLY PICKED UP BY OWNER OF 64C. AND THE JUDGE. THE TOTAL FOR COMPLIANCE ENGINEER CHARGE WAS $115,000. LATER ON AFTER THE JUDGE SENT ALL NEIGHBOURS AND THEIR TWO BUILDING INSURERS HOME WITHOUT ACCEPTING THAT MATTER GOES TO TRIAL, AS THE $700 TOTAL COST OF AFFECTED FENCES IN LENGTH 26.7 M LONG. BUILDING INSURER OF 64C. PAID FOR WHAT WAS CONSIDERED FENCE SHEET ALLEGATIONS [COINCIDENCE STORM DAMAGE TO ONE FENCE AND PAID FOR CLIMBING OVER THE FENCE BY PARTY GOERS TO SECOND FENCE, SUMMED $980. WHICH WAS $286 MORE THAN THE TOTAL VALUE OF ALL FENCE SHEETS BEING INVOLVED IN DISPUTES. A BY-LAW IS REQUIRED TO ALLOW DISPUTES DO NOT WASTE PUBLIC FUNDING FOR ADMINISTRATION WORK ALSO DO NOT PRESSURISE AND ABUSE OWNERS WHO CAN NOT HANDLE HIGH STRESSES AND CAN BECOME REALLY ILL. UNHEALTHY, UNFAIR, EXAGGERATED CHARGES AND LEGAL COSTS, AND VICTIMIZATION ARE THE CAUSE OF THIS WASTE AND ILLNESSES WHICH NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED WITH BETTER RULING WITHIN THE DIVIDING FENCE'S ACT 2020 UPDATE. IN CASE THE ALLEGATIONS CANNOT BE CLARIFIED AND JUDGED QUICKLY BY AUTHORITIES, 50% X 50% FOR BREACHES ON SHARED BORE AGREEMENT DAMAGES COSTS BE ISSUED UNTIL EVERY COST IS SETTLED AT COURT. ALSO WHEN OLD FENCES ARE NO LONGER PROVIDED BY SUPPLIERS AND THEIR VALUE IN BLACK MARKET INCREASES, SAME CHARACTERISTICS FENCE TYPE BE PAID BY BUILDING INSURER, RATHER A FENCE WHICH DOES NOT HAVE THE FEATURES WHICH PREVIOUS FENCE HAD. ALSO THE AGE OF THE FENCE SHEETS BE CONSIDERED IN EVALUATING THE STANDARD OF THE REPLACEMENT FENCE. AGREEMENTS IN THE PAST [DEED OF RELEASE] BE CONSIDERED FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION. FACT SHEETS ARE VERY IMPORTANT FOR DECREASING THE LEGAL COSTS FOR OWNERS.

3. other Fence types which is also suited for hill and garden boundaries

A. ZHEJIANG NEW INSIGHT MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY_WPC_WOOD GRAIN COLOR FENCE_OLYMPIC GAMES FACTORY DIRECT

B. STRATCO POST AND RAIL FENCING
HTTPS://WWW.STRATCO.COM.AU/AU/GARDEN/FENCING/POST-AND-RAIL-FENCING/POST-AND-RAIL-FENCING/
SELECTION, USE AND MAINTENANCE:
HTTPS://WWW.STRATCO.COM.AU/SITEASSETS/PDFS/SELECTION_USE_AND_MAINTENANCE.PDF
HTTPS://WWW.STRATCO.COM.AU/AU/GARDEN/FENCING/POST-AND-RAIL-FENCING/POST-AND-RAIL-FENCING/
OUR "STRATCO ENGINEERED" 64 & 62 CALLEY "PROPOSED FENCE TYPE 2" [HILLY GROUND LEVEL, SLOPING EVERY 2 M LENGTH OF DIVIDING FENCE] FOR 50 CM, THE BOTTOM OF THIS FENCE IS RETAINED WITH ONE ROW OF LIMESTONE BLOCKS WITH SIZE: {L=500} X {W=200} X {H=200} MM. THESE BLOCKS SITS IN 64 CALLEY LAND. SINCE 62 CALLEY WAS BUILT AFTER 64 CALLEY WAS BUILT, THAT HOUSE GETS THE BACK OF THIS FENCE, WHICH HAS RAILS IN IT, BUT RAILS CAN BE COLORED. THE COST FOR THE ONE ROW LIMESTONE WALL IS HALVED. THIS IS DUE TO PETS CANNOT DIG THE SAND ON BOTH SIDES. THE POST OF THIS FENCE IS AN ALLOY
H. POST AND RAIL FENCING

C. HUZHOU KELAI NEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD_STRIPED 2 COLORS_CHEAPER MAINTAINED POSTS
D. WOOD PLASTIC COMPOSITE PROFILE PRODUCTION LINE/WPC PROFILE EXTRUSION
E. MY IMPORTED DIVIDING FENCE MADE OF WOOD PLASTIC COMPOSITE [WPC] IS MEXYTECH-CF01_FOSHAN_TEAK_10 YEARS WARRANTY.16 BAYS [SET] IS REQUIRED.
F. ZHENGYUAN WPC
H. TWO PARTS FENCE POST INSTALLATION FOR LONG LIFE MINIMUM MAINTENANCE OF POST EXPOSED TO RAIN, STORM, TERMITE, RUST, ROT, ETC.
K. OPTIMUM DIVIDING FENCE BY OWNER OF 64 CALLEY [WITH GARDENS, DIY]
L. ROYAL BUILDING PRODUCTS FACTORY 1
M. ALUMINIUM-SLAT FIXED LOUVER HORIZONTAL FENCE PANEL-USD40 [WITH GARDEN-DIY]
R. HDPE PLASTIC TIMBER FENCING-USD6 [2.4 M X 140 MM X 25 MM] BY OWNER OF 64 C. [WITH GARDEN-DIY]

4. Zones Definitions based on Boundary found by licensed Surveyor [L]

ZONE 6L: THIS ZONE IS 5.17 METERS LONG.IT STARTS FROM THE FIRST CORNER PEG AT FRONT YARD NEXT TO LETTER BOX AT 64 C.
ZONE 7L: THIS ZONE IS 5.48 M LONG. IT STARTS AT FRONT CORNER OF BRICK WALL AT 62 C. AND ENDS TO BACK CORNER OF THE BRICK WALL AT 62 C.
ZONE 1L: THIS ZONE IS 3.30 M LONG AND IT STARTS FROM CORNER OF BRICK WALL AT SIDE YARD AT 62 C. AND ENDS TO CORNER OF GARAGE AT BACK YARD OF 64 C.
ZONE 2L: THIS ZONE IS 3.52 M LONG. IT STARTS FROM CORNER OF GARAGE AT BACKYARD OF 64 C. AND ENDS TO CORNER OF BUILDING [FAMILY ROOM] AT BACKYARD OF 64 C.
ZONE 3L: THIS ZONE IS 2 M LONG AND IT STARTS FROM CORNER OF BUILDING [FAMILY ROOM] AT BACK YARD OF 64 C. AND ENDS TO CORNER OF LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL AT 64 C.
ZONE 4L: THIS ZONE IS 4.15 M LONG. IT STARTS AT CORNER OF LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL AT 64 C. AND ENDS TO CORNER OF 44 CM HIGH RETAINING BRICK WALL AT 62 C.
ZONE 5L: THIS ZONE IS 10.55 M LONG. IT STARTS FROM CORNER OF 44 CM HIGH RETAINING BRICK WALL AT 62 C. AND ENDS TO BOUNDARY CORNER NEXT TO WHITE TWIN-SIDE RETAINING WALL AT REAR YARD OF 62 C.[FIRST POST].
ZONE 8L: THIS ZONE IS 3.83 M LONG. IT STARTS FROM CORNER OF 44 CM HIGH BRICK RETAINING WALL AT SIDE YARD OF 62 C. AND ENDS TO CORNER OF 60 CM HIGH BRICK WALL AT BACK YARD OF 62 C.
ZONE 9L: THIS ZONE IS 1.75 M LONG. IT STARTS FROM CORNER OF 60 CM HIGH BRICK RETAINING WALL AT BACK YARD OF 62C. AND ENDS TO CORNER OF BRADFORD RE-ENFORCED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AT 64 C.
ZONE 10L: THIS ZONE IS 4.96 M LONG. IT STARTS FROM CORNER OF BRADFORD RE-ENFORCED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AT 64 C. AND ENDS TO BOUNDARY CORNER NEXT TO WHITE TWIN-SIDE RETAINING WALL AT REAR YARD OF 62 C. [FIRST POST].

5. PHOTOS OF 10 BOUNDARY ZONES, DIVIDING FENCE INCIDENCES AND DAMAGES TO THE DIVIDING FENCE IN RELATION TO INCIDENCES AND STICKY NOTES (COMMENTS) ABOUT PHOTOS:

TO SEE THE STICKY NOTES [COMMENTS) PLEASE LOOK FOR A VERY SMALL BLUE/YELLOW SQUARE ON EACH PHOTO, THEN DOUBLE CLICK ON IT TO READ THE TEXT, IF IT DID NOT OPEN, MAKE SURE THE HAND ICON APPEARS AFTER CLICKING IS TURNED TO ONE INDEX FINGER BY MOVING YOUR MOUSE NEAR THE SMALL SQUARE. TO CLOSE THE STICKY NOTE CLICK X. DON'T FORGET TO DRAG THE KNOB TO SEE ALL PHOTO, ALSO SOME PHOTOS NEED TO BE ROTATED IN ORDER YOU SEE THE DATE HORIZONTALLY, DO SO USING THE MENU TABS. TO PRINT EACH PHOTO, ADJUST YOUR PRINTER TO ALSO PRINT COMMENTS, ANNOTATIONS, ...SO THESE COMMENTS ABOUT EACH PHOTO BE PRINTED.TO OPEN THE FOLLOWING ACCORDION PLEASE CLICK ON EACH + SIGN, TO CLOSE, CLICK ON - SIGN. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION CALL THE PERSON WHO SENT YOU THE URL FOR THIS WEB PAGE.

Zone 1L

zone_1_split_1.pdf
File Size:	5521 kb
File Type:	pdf

PMT (Project Management Techniques) for Hill Retaining Walls by extension of Dividing Fence ACTDate started: 6/1/2020 Date updated: 01/10/2021

9. [Digital Photography and consultation cost $20/photo [each photo is charged once], $20/comment (new comments only)]

Encroaching Brick wall or a Box of sand?

Services

Company

Support

PMT (Project Management Techniques) for Hill Retaining Walls by extension of Dividing Fence ACT
Date started: 6/1/2020 Date updated: 01/10/2021